Thank you Jim, that makes sense ;)
Type: Posts; User: SamJava_the_Hut
Thank you Jim, that makes sense ;)
I'm sorry, but I still don't understand the need to create another constructor to overload a default constructor if you have getters and setters. And just to be clear, the reason I want to understand...
So does that mean if I have a parameterized constructor, I don't need getters and setters?
Hi, I'm just wondering what benefit a parameterized constructor (other than giving the option of overloading the default constructor)? If I had a default constructor along with getters and setters,...