Excel really isn't that good at storing large amounts of data. If it's possible, I'd suggest you ask your company to move towards a database-type solution (something like SQL), then write an...
Type: Posts; User: helloworld922
Re: What is the fastest and most efficient for 3 dimensional structures?
Excel really isn't that good at storing large amounts of data. If it's possible, I'd suggest you ask your company to move towards a database-type solution (something like SQL), then write an...
Re: What is the fastest and most efficient for 3 dimensional structures?
Sounds like a queue or stack would work better for you, depending on if you want LIFO or FIFO. Queues are generally implemented using a linked list while stacks fit well with arrays (or...
Re: What is the fastest and most efficient for 3 dimensional structures?
I know that in 3D computer graphics work that the most common data structures used are some sort of a tree (Oct trees, Bounding volume hierarchy, KD tree, etc.). However, these structures are...