ahh sorry. i thought you mean by
that output, you made it deadlock.. anyway thank you again for the helps
Type: Posts; User: chronoz13
ahh sorry. i thought you mean by
that output, you made it deadlock.. anyway thank you again for the helps
- thank you for this.. i manage to make a newer version producing a deadlock(so it is still possible with multiple references), but im still puzzled why norm manage to make a deadlock using those...
oh yes i forgot this part, i put myself in my own deadlock, i forgot im using an enclosing instance..
"thread schedulers"? if its the reason then... just like what the book says, and...
ok ok wait.. i should be missing something here, maybe the book really stripped everything down from "basic" to "building-blocks thing"
1.) based on my code, I only have 1 foo instance, how come...
I dont exactly understand what you mean by this.. all i understand for now(from what i assume) is one of them should be locked and the other one is not
but like what you have said, i added another...
i just finished a chapter in a book about the basics of Thread(threading).. and i want to focus myself on the deadlock issue so i can finish the chapter clearly,(im not yet into going to "heavy...