That's great!
So, you figured out that the loop control for this problem should have been completely equivalent to your integer version, right?
BigInteger num = BigInteger.ONE;
...
Type: Posts; User: Zaphod_b
That's great!
So, you figured out that the loop control for this problem should have been completely equivalent to your integer version, right?
BigInteger num = BigInteger.ONE;
...
And you didn't notice that it was different from the answer(s) that I posted? I always try to come up with an independent way to check my work, and I even showed the answer obtained from an...
Well...
I just registered at projecteuler.net and submitted the answer to problem #15 that I have posted here several times: 137846528820
It was accepted.
I am apparently the 55434th person...
I meant that I won't go into the combinatorial "solution" any more. (Well not after these few words.)
What I like about the combinatorial solution is that I can arrive at a closed formula without...
I have no connection with or knowledge of Project Euler, and I don't have any ideas about anything else outside the discussion in my post.
Here's the thing:
I believe my description of how...
IF you have never heard of "the number of combinations of N things taken K at a time, you might start here: Combinations-Wikipedia
The number of combinations of N things taken K at a time is given...
Well, since you put it that way, here are my thoughts:
I will restate the problem in a way that is specific enough for me to boil it down to something that is not very complicated (to me).
...