I think "this" is not needed when you do it inside of the constructor.
Type: Posts; User: beer-in-box
I think "this" is not needed when you do it inside of the constructor.
Since I am a young guy and my lessons have nothing to do with programming (If someone tells me that medicine is related to programming, then it is something different), for me it will take longer....
Basicly, you ssay that one can't learn perfect in the first time and this process is never gonna finish :) I get you now.
I was trying to find it in my own language and couldn't find :) That's...
Hmm. I see what you are telling now :) But still I am not so clear. What if I didn't initialize pencere and just declare it? Would it be smarter then? :) Sorry, still noob about some stuff.
...
What do you people say about this code? Is "pencere = f;" right here? Or is it some bad coding too? And if so, why?
Thank you for your comment on that. You are absolutely right. But here is the...
I was looking for a code from the videos and tutorials which I try to learn from to show you. Then I realized an embarrassing mistake I have done. What I wanted to do was not change "pencere" to "f"....
Learnt a better way to answer now from you lol
I remember that in some videos I learnt from, they passed something. Is it possible that they passed only primitive variables like int, long etc? I...
Thank you for your time ha.minh.nam.
So, I have to learn AWT too :)
About my code, you said I shouldn't change argument reference in method body. But I can change it in the constructors, right?...
Hi,
I learnt that Java had AWT in the first place, then Swing was developed. When I took a look at Java book by Herbert Schildt, he says that we should know AWT to learn Swing better. Is this really...