Welcome to the Java Programming Forums
The professional, friendly Java community. 21,500 members and growing!
The Java Programming Forums are a community of Java programmers from all around the World. Our members have a wide range of skills and they all have one thing in common: A passion to learn and code Java. We invite beginner Java programmers right through to Java professionals to post here and share your knowledge. Become a part of the community, help others, expand your knowledge of Java and enjoy talking with like minded people. Registration is quick and best of all free. We look forward to meeting you.
>> REGISTER NOW TO START POSTING
Members have full access to the forums. Advertisements are removed for registered users.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Tomcat can't find class that is placed directly under classes folder
Respected PROGRAMMERS, There was a jsp file
<%@ page import="foo.*" %>
<html>
<body>
The page count is:
<%=Counter.getCount()%>
</body>
</html>
I kept "Counter" Class's package "foo" in
C:\apache-tomcat-6.0.32\webapps\God\WEB-INF\classes
and container could find the class from its package "foo"
But when I try to keep some other class file directly under \WEB-INF\classes and not in any specific package such as "foo", then container can't find that class.
Please help me
Related threads:
Re: Tomcat can't find class that is placed directly under classes folder
I'm not sure which part is giving you trouble- accessing classes that DO have a package in the top-level classes directory, or accessing classes that DON'T have a package from a package-level directory?
Useful links: How to Ask Questions the Smart Way | Use Code Tags | Java Tutorials
Static Void Games - Play indie games, learn from game tutorials and source code, upload your own games!
Re: Tomcat can't find class that is placed directly under classes folder
Hi,
I think in your case the import will be directly the file name without any package .
Please try it
<%@ page import="Content" %>
bean factory
Last edited by abani; December 18th, 2011 at 02:03 AM.
Reply With Quote