Search:

another question: should i always include an appendTail() everytime i do an Append Replacement? although it does nothing... explicitly..

LOL i made it hahahahaha with the use of Pattern and Matcher class.. hahaha thanks for the hard code mate :D :D :D :D. i just need some explnation about those two String pattern/expression things...

oh there, somehow i got the logic of the program, appendReplacement() and appendTail() with the code above, im just confused with the pattern expression

([hH])(e)(l)(l)

does this mean, a...

i can only say thanks for the code for now.. its way too complicated for me , ill just post further questions if i had,, thanks again so much :D

oh there, now i use the .group() method, which is equivalent to


.substring(matcherObj.start(), matcherObj.end()); that returns a String object(sequence) where the matcher matches the pattern, im...

ahh not yet.. i dont have any idea how to use group() methods, ... but ill give it a try..

finally i found the error, and its on me LOL, i just notice im checking the pattern checking things with a different objects, one with a matcher object and another one with a string object.. but im...

uhm.. thats why im trying to push myself to the limit, because im trying to avoid creating temporary string objects with + operator, i have already solved the problem with a common approach, but it...

oh yes, i have used a while loop to the searching

while (matcher.find()) {

built.insert(matcher.start(), "egg");
}

but the output looks like this... hmmm...

hmm you mean,, i cant still use the find method to compensate with the problem?

yes, exactly.. :(

given a matcher object has already a pattern to match and a string value to search for.

1) is the .find() method similar to looping a character sequence just to find a matching pattern?

...