Of course it is "allowed", if only because a compiler shouldn't reject a class just because it is unfinished. But I do think an abstract class with no abstract methods may be indicative of a problem....
Type: Posts; User: 2by4
Of course it is "allowed", if only because a compiler shouldn't reject a class just because it is unfinished. But I do think an abstract class with no abstract methods may be indicative of a problem....
The problem is not the abstract class, it is the fact that you haven't told your method which rose you are working with. N.B if it is not a specific rose, you have to specify your method at class...
The OP clarifies, if you read it.
Why is the class abstract? I don't see any abstract methods.